Journal
JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 135, Issue -, Pages 50-60Publisher
ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.12.004
Keywords
Size exclusion chromatography; Kinetic efficiency; Extra-column band broadening; Aggregates; Monoclonal antibodies
Categories
Funding
- Swiss National Science Foundation [31003A 159494]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In the last fewyears, highly efficient UHP-SEC columns packed with sub-3 mu m particles were commercialized by several providers. Besides the particle size reduction, the dimensions of modern SEC stationary phases (150 x 4.6 mm) was also modified compared to regular SEC columns (300 x 6 or 300 x 8 mm). Because the analytes are excluded from the pores in SEC, the retention factors are very low, ranging from -1 < k < 0, resulting in very small column band variance. Therefore, the contribution of the system itself to peak variance can become significant under UHP-SEC conditions. The goal of this study was to evaluate the loss of efficiency observed with three different instruments (regular HPLC, non-optimized UHPLC and fully optimized UHPLC) offering different system variances. It appears that the new 150 x 4.6 mm, sub-3 mu m SEC columns cannot be employed on a regular HPLC instrument, since the efficiency loss was equal to 60-85%, when analyzing mAb sample. Optimized UHPLC systems having very low extra-column volumes (typically V-ec < 10 mu L) have therefore to be used to properly operate these columns. Due to the instrument contribution to band broadening, the apparent efficiency of SEC columns packed with sub-2 mu m particles can indeed be hampered when using inappropriate system. Considering the extra-column band broadening contribution of current UHPLC instruments, a further decrease of SEC column dimension is therefore not desired. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available