4.6 Article

Molecularly imprinted polymer for glutathione by modified precipitation polymerization and its application to determination of glutathione in supplements

Journal

JOURNAL OF PHARMACEUTICAL AND BIOMEDICAL ANALYSIS
Volume 144, Issue -, Pages 230-235

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpba.2016.12.006

Keywords

Molecularly imprinted polymer; Modified precipitation polymerization; Glutathione; Glutathione disulfide

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [16K08212]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16K08212] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecularly imprinted polymers (MIP) particles for glutathione (GSH) with a narrow particle size distribution were prepared by modified precipitation polymerization using methacrylic acid as a functional monomer, divinylbenzene as a crosslinker and water as a co-solvent. The particle diameters of the MIP and non-imprinted polymer (NIP) prepared under the optimum conditions were 3.81 +/- 0.95 (average +/- standard deviation) and 3.39 +/- 1.22 mu m, respectively. The retention and molecular-recognition properties of the prepared MIP were evaluated using a mixture of acetonitrile and water as a mobile phase in hydrophilic interaction chromatography. With an increase of acetonitrile content, the retention factor of GSH was increased on the MIP. In addition to shape recognition, hydrophilic interactions seem to work for the recognition of GSH on the MIP. The MIP had a specific molecular-recognition ability for GSH, while glutathione disulfide, L-Glu, L-Cys, Gly-Gly and L-Cys-Gly could not be retained or recognized on the MIP. The effect of column temperature revealed that the separation of GSH on the MIP was entropically driven. Binding experiments and Scatchard analyses revealed that one binding sites were formed on both the MIP and NIP, while the MIP gave higher affinity and capacity for GSH than the NIP. Furthermore, the MIP was successfully applied for determination of GSH in the supplements. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available