4.6 Article

Thermally induced phase separation and electrospinning methods for emerging membrane applications: A review

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 461-490

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.15076

Keywords

membrane materials; membrane separations; green engineering; fibers; polymer processing

Funding

  1. Nano Material Technology Development Program [2012M3A7B4949745]
  2. National Research Foundation of the Korean Ministry of Science, ICT and Future Planning
  3. Solvay Specialty Polymers
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2012M3A7B4049745] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this review, thermally induced phase separation (TIPS) and electrospinning methods for preparation of fluoropolymer membranes are assessed, particularly for the polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) and polyethylene chlorotrifluoroethylene membranes. This review focuses on controlling the membrane morphology from the thermodynamic and kinetic perspectives to understand the relationship between the membrane morphology and fabrication parameters. In addition, the current status of the nonsolvent induced phase separation (NIPS) method and the combined NIPS-TIPS (N-TIPS) method, which is a new emerging fabrication method, are discussed. The past literature data are compiled and an upperbound curve (permeability vs. tensile strength) is proposed for the TIPS-prepared PVDF membranes. Furthermore, the key parameters that control and determine the membrane morphology when using the electrospinning method are reviewed. Exploiting the unique advantages of the electrospinning method, our current understanding in controlling and fine-tuning the PVDF crystal polymorphism (i.e., -phase) is critically assessed. (c) 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 62: 461-490, 2016

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available