4.5 Article

Identification of MicroRNAs by Microarray Analysis and Prediction of Target Genes Involved in Osteogenic Differentiation of Human Periodontal Ligament Stem Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 10, Pages 1105-1113

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1902/jop.2017.170079

Keywords

Cell differentiation; genes; microRNAs; osteogenesis; periodontal ligament; stem cells

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81600882]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Guangzhou, China [2015A030310140]
  3. President Foundation of Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangdong, China [2014B005, 2015Z015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The roles of microRNAs (miRNAs) in osteogenic differentiation of human periodontal ligament stem cells (hPDLSCs) remain largely unexplored. In this study, the underlying molecular mechanism of osteogenic differentiation in hPDLSCs is investigated using miRNA profiling. Methods: The miRNA expression profile during osteogenic differentiation was analyzed using a microarray. Target genes of miRNAs with at least two-fold change in expression (P < 0.05) were predicted by bioinformatics. Six miRNAs with osteogenesis-related target genes were validated by quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Results: Expression of 116 miRNAs was found to be altered after osteoinduction, with 30 upregulated and 86 downregulated. Thirty-one of these miRNAs (26.7%) had osteogenesis-related target genes. Changes in expression levels of six of the 31 miRNAs (miR-654-3p, miR-4288, miR34c-5p, miR-218-5p, miR-663a, and miR-874-3p) were validated by qRT-PCR. Conclusions: Significant alterations in miRNA expression profiles were observed during osteogenic differentiation of hPDLSCs. These results imply that miRNAs may have regulatory effects on this process by targeting osteogenesis-related genes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available