4.3 Article

Maternal milk feedings reduce sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis and improve outcomes of premature infants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 38, Issue 1, Pages 71-74

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2017.149

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [RO1 HD059143]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: Human milk (donor milk (DM) and/or maternal milk (MM)) feedings protect against late onset sepsis (LOS), necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC) and death. However, DM lacks many anti-infective components of MM. Therefore, we studied exclusive MM feedings to evaluate the full effect of human milk on infectious and other outcomes in premature infants. STUDY DESIGN: All infants born before 33 weeks postmenstrual age (PMA) who received exclusive (>95%) MM or exclusive preterm formula (PF) were included in this prospective investigation. RESULTS: Sixty-three infants (53%) received MM and 55 infants (47%) received PF. Both groups had similar baseline characteristics. Infants in the MM group achieved full enteral nutrition sooner (14 +/- 8 vs 19 +/- 15 days, P < 0.03) and required a shorter duration of central venous lines (14 +/- 10 vs 22 +/- 21, P < 0.005). Fewer infants in the MM group developed LOS (9 vs 19, P < 0.05) and pneumonia (8 vs 16, P < 0.05) than PF infants. Only one MM and five PF infants developed NEC (Bell stage. II). Logistic regression analysis using PMA and prolonged rupture of membranes as covariates demonstrated an increased rate of NEC (odds ratio = 8.85, CI = 1.01 to 25.17, P = 0.048) in PF infants. Periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) was more common in PF (4 vs 0, P = 0.04) than in MM infants. CONCLUSION: Feedings of MM advanced more rapidly and were associated with fewer infections than PF. A possible protective effect of MM against PVL, not previously described, may be related to its immune and anti-inflammatory components.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available