4.3 Article

Barriers to enrollment in a randomized controlled trial of hydrocortisone for cardiovascular insufficiency in term and late preterm newborn infants

Journal

JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY
Volume 37, Issue 11, Pages 1220-1223

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2017.131

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NICHD NIH HHS [U10 HD053109, U10 HD040689, U10 HD040492, U01 HD036790, U10 HD068244, U10 HD068263, U10 HD021385, UG1 HD068263, U10 HD068270, U10 HD027851, UG1 HD040492, U10 HD068278, UG1 HD021364, UG1 HD053109, U10 HD068284, UG1 HD027880, UG1 HD034216, UG1 HD027851, U10 HD034216, UG1 HD068278, UG1 HD027856, U10 HD053089, UG1 HD053089, UG1 HD040689, U10 HD027856, UG1 HD068270, U10 HD021373, U10 HD027880, UG1 HD027853, U10 HD021364] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To analyze reasons for low enrollment in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of the effect of hydrocortisone for cardiovascular insufficiency on survival without neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI) in term/late preterm newborns. STUDY DESIGN: The original study was a multicenter RCT. Eligibility: >= 34 weeks' gestation, < 72 h old, mechanically ventilated, receiving inotrope. Primary outcome was NDI at 2 years; infants with diagnoses at high risk for NDI were excluded. This paper presents an analysis of reasons for low patient enrollment. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-seven of the 932 otherwise eligible infants received inotropes; however, 207 (81%) had exclusionary diagnoses. Only 12 infants were randomized over 10 months; therefore, the study was terminated. Contributing factors included few eligible infants after exclusions, open-label steroid therapy and a narrow enrollment window. CONCLUSION: Despite an observational study to estimate the population, very few infants were enrolled. Successful RCTs of emergent therapy may require fewer exclusions, a short-term primary outcome, waiver of consent and/or other alternatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available