4.4 Article Proceedings Paper

Cannulating the contraindicated: effect of low birth weight on mortality in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

Journal

JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY
Volume 52, Issue 12, Pages 2018-2025

Publisher

W B SAUNDERS CO-ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2017.08.037

Keywords

CDH; ECMO; Low birthweight; Low gestation

Funding

  1. CHOC/Pediatric Surgical Faculty (PSF) Tithe Award
  2. National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health (NIH), through Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Research Design Unit [UL1 TR001414]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/purpose: Restrictions for ECMO in neonates include birth weight less than 2 kg (BW <2 kg) and/or gestational age less than 34 weeks (GA <34 weeks). We sought to describe their relationship on mortality. Methods: Neonates with a primary diagnosis code of CDH were identified in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) registry, and logistic regression models were used to examine the effect of BW <2 kg and GA <34 weeks on mortality. Results: We identified 7564 neonates with CDH. The overall mortality was 50%. There was a significantly higher risk of death with unadjusted odds ratio (OR) 2.39 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53-3.74; P < 0.01) for BW <2 kg neonates. The adjusted OR of death for BW <2 kg neonates remained significantly high with over two-fold increase in the odds of mortality when adjusted for potential confounding variables (OR 2.11, 95% CI: 1.30-3.43; P < 0.01). However, no difference in mortality was observed in neonates with GA <34 weeks. Conclusions: While mortality among CDH neonates with a BW <2 kg was substantially increased, GA <34 weeks was not significantly associated with mortality. Effort should be made to identify the best candidates for ECMO in this high-risk group and develop treatment strategies to optimize their survival. Type of study: Case-Control Study, Retrospective Comparative Study. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available