4.6 Article

Fast pyrolysis of glucose-based carbohydrates with added NaCl part 1: Experiments and development of a mechanistic model

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 62, Issue 3, Pages 766-777

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.15106

Keywords

fast pyrolysis; reaction mechanism; kinetics; mechanistic modeling; sodium chloride

Funding

  1. Department of Energy (DOE) Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy (EERE) through the Office of Biomass Program [DEEE0003044]
  2. National Science Foundation [CBET-1435228]
  3. Institute for Sustainability and Energy at Northwestern (ISEN)
  4. DOE Computational Science Graduate Fellowship (CSGF) [DE-FG02-97ER25308]
  5. ARCS Foundation Inc., Chicago Chapter

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sodium ions, one of the natural inorganic constituents in lignocellulosic biomass, significantly alter pyrolysis behavior and resulting chemical speciation. Here, experiments were conducted using a micropyrolyzer to investigate the catalytic effects of NaCl on fast pyrolysis of glucose-based carbohydrates (glucose, cellobiose, maltohexaose, and cellulose), and on a major product of cellulose pyrolysis, levoglucosan (LVG). A mechanistic model that addressed the significant catalytic effects of NaCl on the product distribution was developed. The model incorporated interactions of Na+ with cellulosic chains and low molecular weight species, reactions mediated by Na+ including dehydration, cyclic/Grob fragmentation, ring-opening/closing, isomerization, and char formation, and a degradation network of LVG in the presence of Na+. Rate coefficients of elementary steps were specified based on Arrhenius parameters. The mechanistic model for cellulose included 768 reactions of 222 species, which included 252 reactions of 150 species comprising the mechanistic model of glucose decomposition in the presence of NaCl. (c) 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 62: 766-777, 2016

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available