4.6 Article

A hierarchical method to integrated solvent and process design of physical CO2 absorption using the SAFT- Mie approach

Journal

AICHE JOURNAL
Volume 61, Issue 10, Pages 3249-3269

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/aic.14838

Keywords

computer-aided molecular and process design; statistical associating fluid theory; multiobjective optimization; reduced model; CO2 absorption

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) of the UK [EP/E016340, EP/J014958]
  2. German Academic Exchange Service (DAAD)
  3. EPSRC [EP/J003840]
  4. Imperial College Scholarship
  5. EPSRC [EP/J003840/1, EP/J014958/1, EP/E016340/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J003840/1, EP/E016340/1, EP/J014958/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Molecular-level decisions are increasingly recognized as an integral part of process design. Finding the optimal process performance requires the integrated optimization of process and solvent chemical structure, leading to a challenging mixed-integer nonlinear programming (MINLP) problem. The formulation of such problems when using a group contribution version of the statistical associating fluid theory, SAFT- Mie, to predict the physical properties of the relevant mixtures reliably over process conditions is presented. To solve the challenging MINLP, a novel hierarchical methodology for integrated process and solvent design (hierarchical optimization) is presented. Reduced models of the process units are developed and used to generate a set of initial guesses for the MINLP solution. The methodology is applied to the design of a physical absorption process to separate carbon dioxide from methane, using a broad selection of ethers as the molecular design space. The solvents with best process performance are found to be poly(oxymethylene)dimethylethers. (c) 2015 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 61: 3249-3269, 2015

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available