Journal
PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 100, Issue 7, Pages -Publisher
AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.100.074013
Keywords
-
Funding
- European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme [683211]
- UK STFC [ST/L002760/1, ST/K004883/1]
- STFC [ST/K004883/1, ST/L002760/1] Funding Source: UKRI
Ask authors/readers for more resources
In any calculation in perturbative quantum chromodynamics (QCD) a choice needs to be made for the unphysical renormalization scale, mu(R). The Brodsky-Lepage-Mackenzie/principle of maximum conformality (BLM/PMC) scale-setting procedure is one proposed method for selecting this scale. In this work we identify three ambiguities in the BLM/PMC procedure itself. Their numerical impact is studied using the example of the total cross section for t (t) over bar production through next-to-next-to-leading order in QCD. One ambiguity is the arbitrary choice of the value of the highest-order PMC scale. The numerical impact of this choice on the BLM/PMC prediction for the cross section is found to be comparable to the impact of the choice of mu(R) in the conventional scale-setting approach. Another ambiguity relates to the definitions of the other PMC scales and is similarly found to have a large impact on the cross section.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available