4.3 Article

Size Matters: Defining Critical in Bone Defect Size!

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC TRAUMA
Volume 31, Issue -, Pages S20-S22

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0000000000000978

Keywords

critical sized; bone defect; union; fracture healing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Bone defects are common and are associated with a significant burden of disease. The treatment of these injuries remains controversial, particularly those defects which are critical sized. Despite the need for decision making to be evidence based, a lack of consensus around definitions of critical-sized defects still exists, particularly around those defects in the 1-3 cm range. There is a need to define critical in bone defect size because noncritical defects may heal without planned reconstruction and secondary surgery. This article reviews the current evidence around the definition of a critical-sized bone defect and concludes that defects in the order of 2.5 cm or greater seem to have a poor natural history.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available