4.5 Article

Histological and reference system for the analysis of mouse intervertebral disc

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 233-243

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.23637

Keywords

intervertebral disc; intervertebral disc degeneration; disc histological score; histology; mouse intervertebral disc; mice

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [MOP-115068, MOP-115718]
  2. Research Grants Committee of Hong Kong Theme-Based Research Scheme [T-12-708/12N]
  3. National Basic Research Program of China (973 program) [2014CB942901]
  4. AOSpine [106540]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new scoring system based on histo-morphology of mouse intervertebral disc (IVD) was established to assess changes in different mouse models of IVD degeneration and repair. IVDs from mouse strains of different ages, transgenic mice, or models of artificially induced IVD degeneration were assessed. Morphological features consistently observed in normal, and early/later stages of degeneration were categorized into a scoring system focused on nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF) changes. Normal NP exhibited a highly cellularized cell mass that decreased with natural ageing and in disc degeneration. Normal AF consisted of distinct concentric lamellar structures, which was disrupted in severe degeneration. NP/AF clefts indicated more severe changes. Consistent scores were obtained between experienced and new users. Altogether, our scoring system effectively differentiated IVD changes in various strains of wild-type and genetically modified mice and in induced models of IVD degeneration, and is applicable from the post-natal stage to the aged mouse. This scoring tool and reference resource addresses a pressing need in the field for studying IVD changes and cross-study comparisons in mice, and facilitates a means to normalize mouse IVD assessment between different laboratories. (c) 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:233-243, 2018.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available