4.7 Article

Investigation and Demonstration of Catalyst/Initiator-Driven Selectivity in Thiol-Michael Reactions

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 82, Issue 15, Pages 7946-7956

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.joc.7b01200

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation CAREER [CHE-1352239]
  2. Wesleyan University
  3. Division Of Chemistry
  4. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1352239] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Thiol-Michael click reactions are essential synthetic tools in the preparation of various materials including polymers, dendrimers, and other macromolecules. Despite increasing efforts to apply thiol-Michael chemistry in a controlled fashion, the selectivity of base- or nucleophile-promoted thiol-Michael reactions in complex mixtures of multiple thiols and/or acceptors remains largely unknown. Herein, we report a thorough fundamental study of the selectivity of thiol-Michael reactions through a series of 270 ternary reactions using H-1 NMR spectroscopy to quantify product selectivity. The varying influences of different catalysts/initiators are explored using ternary reactions between two Michael acceptors and a single thiol or between a single Michael acceptor and two thiols using three different catalysts/initiators (triethylamine, DBU, and dimethylphenylphosphine) in chloroform. The results from the ternary reactions provide a platform from which sequential quaternary, one-pot quaternary, and sequential senary thiol-Michael reactions were designed and their selectivities quantified. These results provide insights into the design of selective thiol-Michael reactions that can be used for the synthesis and functionalization of multicomponent polymers and further informs how catalyst/initiator choice influences the reactivity between a given thiol and Michael acceptor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available