4.1 Article

Targeted metabolomics approach for identification of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis markers and evaluation of diagnostic models

Journal

MEDCHEMCOMM
Volume 10, Issue 10, Pages 1803-1809

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9md00253g

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Russian State funded budget project of ICBFM SB RAS [AAAA-A17-117020210025-5]
  2. Russian Ministry of Education and Science (NSU-SBRAS Collaborative Lab) [5-100]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an inflammatory autoimmune disease that causes demyelination of nerve cell axons. This paper is devoted to the study of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) biomarkers using an LC-MS/MS-based targeted metabolomics approach and the assessment of changes in the profile of 13 amino acids and 29 acylcarnitines in plasma during the relapse of the disease. A significant increase (p < 0.05) in the concentration of glutamate in plasma in patients with RRMS was detected, while the sum of leucine and isoleucine was reduced. A decrease in the concentration of decenoylcarnitine (C10:1, p < 0.05) was observed among acylcarnitines, and this metabolite was detected as a biomarker for the disease for the first time. Several models based on a single marker or multiple pre-selected markers and multivariate analysis with a dimension reduction technique were compared in their effectiveness for the classification of RRMS and healthy controls. The best results for cross-validation showed models of general linear regression (GLM, AUC = 0.783) and random forest model (RF, AUC = 0.769) based on pre-selected biomarkers. Validation of the models on the test set showed that the RF model based on selected metabolites was the most effective (AUC = 0.72). The results obtained are promising for further development of the system of clinical decision support for the diagnosis of RRMS based on metabolic data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available