4.4 Article

Malignant transformation of oral submucous fibrosis in Taiwan: A nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL PATHOLOGY & MEDICINE
Volume 46, Issue 10, Pages 1040-1045

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jop.12570

Keywords

cohort study; malignant transformation; nationwide population; oral submucous fibrosis

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Technology [MOST 103-2632-B-040-001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundOral submucous fibrosis (OSF) is one of the well-recognized oral potentially malignant disorders. In this study, we investigated the malignant transformation of OSF in a Taiwanese population. MethodsA retrospective cohort study was analyzed from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database. A comparison cohort was randomly frequency-matched with the OSF cohort according to age, sex, and index year. Oral leukoplakia (OL) was further stratified to evaluate for the possible synergistic effects of OSF-associated malignant transformation. ResultsIn this cohort, 71 (9.13%) of 778 cases of OSF were observed to transform into oral cancer. The malignant transformation rate was 29.26-fold in the OSF cohort than in the comparison cohort after adjustment (95% confidence intervals 20.55-41.67). To further stratify with OL, OSF with OL (52.46%; 95% confidence intervals 34.88-78.91) had higher risk of malignant transformation rate than OSF alone (29.84%; 95% confidence intervals 20.99-42.42). The Kaplan-Meier plot revealed the rate free of malignant transformation was significant over the 13-year follow-up period (log-rank test, P<.001). The mean duration of malignant transformation was 5.1, 2.7, and 2.2years for non-OSF, OSF alone, and OSF with OL, respectively. ConclusionOral submucous fibrosis patients exhibited a significantly higher risk of malignant transformation than those without OSF. OL could enhance malignant transformation in patients with OSF.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available