4.4 Article

Who Leads? Who Follows? Measuring Issue Attention and Agenda Setting by Legislators and the Mass Public Using Social Media Data

Journal

AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 113, Issue 4, Pages 883-901

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0003055419000352

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. INSPIRE program of the National Science Foundation [1248077]
  2. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
  3. William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
  4. Rita Allen Foundation
  5. John S. and James L. Knight Foundation
  6. Intel
  7. Gordon and Betty Moore Foundation
  8. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Are legislators responsive to the priorities of the public? Research demonstrates a strong correspondence between the issues about which the public cares and the issues addressed by politicians, but conclusive evidence about who leads whom in setting the political agenda has yet to be uncovered. We answer this question with fine-grained temporal analyses of Twitter messages by legislators and the public during the 113thUSCongress. After employing an unsupervised methodthat classifies tweets sent by legislators and citizens into topics, we use vector autoregression models to explore whose priorities more strongly predict the relationship between citizens and politicians. We find that legislators are more likely to follow, than to lead, discussion of public issues, results that hold even after controlling for the agenda-setting effects of the media. We also find, however, that legislators are more likely to be responsive to their supporters than to the general public.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available