4.7 Article

PET Using a GRPR Antagonist Ga-68-RM26 in Healthy Volunteers and Prostate Cancer Patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 59, Issue 6, Pages 922-928

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.198929

Keywords

GRPR antagonist; RM26; PET; dosimetry; prostate cancer

Funding

  1. Intramural Research Program (IRP) of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB)
  2. National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81701742, 81671722]
  4. special fund for scientific research in the public interests of health [201402001]
  5. CAMS Major Collaborative Innovation Project [2016-I2M-1-011]
  6. Key Project on Inter Governmental International Scientific and Technological Innovation Cooperation in National Key Projects of Research and Development Plan [2016YFE0115400]
  7. PUMC Youth Fund
  8. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017320003]
  9. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL IMAGING AND BIOENGINEERING [ZICEB000087] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was designed to analyze the safety, biodistribution, and radiation dosimetry of a gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) antagonist PET tracer, Ga-68-RM26; to assess its clinical diagnostic value in prostate cancer patients; and to perform a direct comparison between GRPR antagonist Ga-68-RM26 and agonist Ga-68-BBN. Methods: Five healthy volunteers were enrolled to validate the safety of Ga-68-RM26 and calculate dosimetry. A total of 28 patients with prostate cancer (17 newly diagnosed and 11 posttherapy) were recruited and provided written informed consent. All the cancer patients underwent PET/CT at 15-30 min after intravenous injection of 1.85 MBq (0.05 mCi) per kilogram of body weight of Ga-68-RM26. Among them, 22 patients (11 newly diagnosed and 11 posttherapy) underwent Ga-68-BBN PET/CT for comparison within 1 wk. Tc-99m-MDP (methylene diphosphonate) bone scans were obtained within 2 wk for comparison. GRPR immunohistochemical staining of tumor samples was performed. Results: The administration of Ga-68-M26 was well tolerated by all subjects, with no adverse symptoms being noticed or reported during the procedure and at 2-wk follow-up. The total effective dose equivalent and effective dose were 0.0912 +/- 0.0140 and 0.0657 +/- 0.0124 mSv/MBq, respectively. In the 17 patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer, Ga-68-RM26 PET/CT showed positive prostate-confined findings in 15 tumors with an SUVmax of 6.49 +/- 2.37. In the 11 patients who underwent prostatectomy or brachytherapy with or without androgen deprivation therapy, Ga-68-RM26 PET/CT detected 8 metastatic lymph nodes in 3 patients with an SUVmax of 4.28 +/- 1.25 and 21 bone lesions in 8 patients with an SUVmax of 3.90 +/- 3.07. Compared with Ga-68-RM26 PET/CT, GRPR agonist Ga-68-BBN PET/CT detected fewer primary lesions and lymph node metastases as well as demonstrated lower tracer accumulation. There was a significant positive correlation between SUV derived from Ga-68-RM26 PET and the expression level of GRPR (P < 0.001). Conclusion: This study indicates the safety and significant efficiency of GRPR antagonist Ga-68-RM26. Ga-68-RM26 PET/CT would have remarkable value in detecting both primary prostate cancer and metastasis. Ga-68-RM26 is also expected to be better than GRPR agonist as an imaging marker to evaluate GRPR expression in prostate cancer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available