4.7 Article

Impact of 68Ga-Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen PET/CT on Prostate Cancer Management

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages 89-92

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.192625

Keywords

PSMA; PET/CT; prostate cancer; biochemical recurrence; management change

Funding

  1. UCLH NIHR BRC
  2. UCL Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre
  3. London North West Healthcare Charitable Fund
  4. UCLH/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  5. MRC [G0701302, G1002509] Funding Source: UKRI
  6. Cancer Research UK [16463] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0701302, G1002509] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [CL-2007-18-015] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. Prostate Cancer UK [PG13-025] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The objective of this study was to assess the impact of Ga-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (Ga-68-PSMA) PET/CT on the management of prostate cancer in patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR). Methods: Documented management plans before and after Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT in 100 patients with BCR were retrospectively reviewed, and changes in plans were recorded. Results: Management changed after Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT in 39 patients (39%). The management changes occurred in 23 (33.8%) of 68 patients with radical prostatectomy and 16 (50%) of 32 patients previously treated with radical radiotherapy. Positive scan results (P < 0.001) and higher prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels (P = 0.024) were associated with management changes. No significant association with management change was found for Gleason grade, stage, presence of metastatic disease, PSA velocity, or PSA doubling time. Conclusion: Ga-68-PSMA PET/CT altered management in 39% of patients with BCR, and changes occurred more often in patients with radical radiotherapy treatment, positive Ga-68-PSMA scan results, and higher PSA levels.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available