4.7 Article

Improved Estrogen Receptor Assessment by PET Using the Novel Radiotracer 18F-4FMFES in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer Patients: An Ongoing Phase II Clinical Trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 197-203

Publisher

SOC NUCLEAR MEDICINE INC
DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.194654

Keywords

recepor PET imaging; ER; breast cancer; F-18-FES; F-18-4FMFES

Funding

  1. Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation (CBCF)
  2. Fonds de la Recherche du Quebec-Sante (FRQ-S)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After encouraging preclinical and human dosimetry results for the novel estrogen receptor (ER) PET radiotracer 4-fluoro-11 beta W-methoxy-16 alpha-F-18-fluoroestradiol (F-18-4FMFES), a phase II clinical trial was initiated to compare the PET imaging diagnostic potential of F-18-4FMFES with that of 16-F-18-fluoroestradiol (F-18-FES) in ER-positive(ER+) breast cancer patients. Methods: Patients diagnosed with ER+ breast cancer (n = 31) were recruited for this study, including 6 who underwent mastectomy or axillary node dissection. For each patient, F-18-FES and F-18-4FMFES PET/CT scans were done sequentially (within a week) and in random order. One hour after injection of either radiotracer, a head-to-thigh static scan with a 2-min acquisition per bed position was obtained. Blood samples were taken at different times after injection to assess each tracer metabolism by reverse phase thin-layer chromatography. The SUVmean of nonspecific tissues and the SUVmax of the tumor were evaluated for each detected lesion, and tumor-to-nonspecific organ ratios were calculated. Results: Blood metabolite analysis 60 min after injection of the tracer showed a 2.5-fold increase in metabolic stability of F-18-4FMFES over F-18-FES. Although for most foci F-18-4FMFES PET had an SUVmax similar to that of F-18-FES PET, tumor contrast improved substantially in all cases. Lower uptake was consistently observed in nonspecific tissues for F-18-4FMFES, notably a 4-fold decrease in blood-pool activity as compared with F-18-FES. Consequently, image quality was considerably improved using F-18-4FMFES, with lower overall background activity. As a result, F-18-4FMFES successfully identified 9 more lesions than F-18-FES. Conclusion: This phase II study with ER+ breast cancer patients showed that F-18-4FMFES PET achieves a lower nonspecific signal and better tumor contrast than F-18-FES PET, resulting in improved diagnostic confidence and lower false-negative diagnoses.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available