4.8 Article

Inverse Design of Solid-State Materials via a Continuous Representation

Journal

MATTER
Volume 1, Issue 5, Pages 1370-1384

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2019.08.017

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2017R1A2B3010176]
  2. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning grants from the Korean Government [KETEP-20188500000440]
  3. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-SC0004993]
  4. Canada 150 Research Chairs Program
  5. Natural Resources Canada
  6. Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship Program
  7. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20188500000440] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The non-serendipitous discovery of materials with targeted properties is the ultimate goal of materials research, but to date, materials design lacks the incorporation of all available knowledge to plan the synthesis of the next material. This work presents a framework for learning a continuous representation of materials and building a model for new discovery using latent space representation. The ability of autoencoders to generate experimental materials is demonstrated with vanadium oxides via rediscovery of experimentally known structures when the model was trained without them. Approximately 20,000 hypothetical materials are generated, leading to several completely new metastable VxOy materials that may be synthesizable. Comparison with genetic algorithms suggests computational efficiency of generative models that can explore chemical compositional space effectively by learning the distributions of known materials for crystal structure prediction. These results are an important step toward machine-learned inverse design of inorganic functional materials using generative models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available