4.7 Article

Ab initio study of interstitial cluster interaction with Re, Os, and Ta in W

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MATERIALS
Volume 484, Issue -, Pages 30-41

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jnucmat.2016.11.002

Keywords

Fusion; Tungsten; Interstitial cluster; Structure; Stability; Dissociation; Solute; Binding energy; Density functional theory; Finite-size scaling; Semicore states; Transmutation; Diffusion

Funding

  1. U. S. Department of Energy Office of Fusion Energy Sciences [DE-AC06-76RL0-1830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The stability of tungsten self-interstitial atom (SIA) clusters is studied using first-principles methods. Clusters from one to seven SIAs are systematically explored from 1264 unique configurations. Finite-size effect of the simulation cell is corrected based on the scaling of formation energy versus inverse volume cell. Furthermore, the accuracy of the calculations is improved by treating the 5p semicore states as valence states. ConfigUrations of the three most stable clusters in each cluster size n are presented, which consist of parallel 1111] dumbbells. The evolution of these clusters leading to small dislocation loops is discussed. The binding energy of size-n clusters is analyzed relative to an n ->(n-1) + 1 dissociation and is shown to increase with size. Extrapolation for n> 7 is presented using a dislocation loop model. In addition, the interaction of these clusters with a substitutional Re, Os, or Ta solute is explored by replacing one of the dumbbells with the solute. Re and Os strongly attract these clusters, but Ta strongly repels. The strongest interaction is found when the solute is located on the periphery of the cluster rather than in the middle. The magnitude of this interaction decreases with cluster size. Empirical fits to describe the trend of the solute binding energy are presented. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available