4.7 Article

Prediction of temperate broadleaf tree species mortality in arid limestone habitats with stomatal safety margins

Journal

TREE PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 8, Pages 1428-1437

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/treephys/tpz045

Keywords

drought-induced tree mortality; hydraulic failure; hydraulic safety margin; stomatal regulation; stomatal safety margin; xylem embolism resistance

Categories

Funding

  1. Fundamental Research Funds of Research Institute of Forestry New Technology, CAF [CAFYBB2017SY047]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31800513, 31290223]
  3. European Investment Bank Loan: Shandong Coastal Shelter Forest Project (SCSFP-KY-3)
  4. World Bank Loan: Shandong Ecological Afforestation Project (SEAP-KY-1)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A growing body of evidence highlights the occurrence of increased widespread tree mortality during climate change-associated severe droughts; however, in situ long-term drought experiments with multispecies communities for the prediction of tree mortality and exploration of related mechanisms are rather limited in natural environments. We conducted a 7-year afforestation trial with 20 drought-resistant broadleaf tree species in an arid limestone habitat in northern China, where the species displayed a broad range of survival rates. The stomatal and xylem hydraulic traits of all the species were measured. We found that species' stomatal closure points were strongly related to their xylem embolism resistance and xylem minimum water potential but not to their survival rates. Hydraulic failure of the vascular system appeared to be the main cause of tree mortality, and the stomatal safety margin was a better predictor of tree mortality than the traditionally considered xylem embolism resistance and hydraulic safety margin. We recommend the stomatal safety margin as the indicator for predicting drought-induced tree mortality and for selecting tree species in future forest restorations in arid regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available