4.5 Article

Glial Fibrillary Acidic Protein and Ubiquitin C-Terminal Hydrolase-L1 Are Not Specific Biomarkers for Mild CT-Negative Traumatic Brain Injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 34, Issue 7, Pages 1427-1438

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4442

Keywords

biomarker; GFAP; orthopedic injury; TBI; UCH-L1

Funding

  1. European Commission under the 7th Framework Programme [FP7-270259-TBIcare]
  2. personal Government's Special Financial Transfer tied to academic research in Health Sciences
  3. Maire Taponen Foundation
  4. Health Foundation/Academy of Medical Sciences Clinician Scientist Fellowship
  5. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Research Fellowship
  6. Academy of Medical Sciences (AMS) [AMS-CSF4-Newcombe] Funding Source: researchfish
  7. Medical Research Council [G0600986] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. National Institute for Health Research [NF-SI-0512-10090, ACF-2009-14-007, NIHR-RP-R3-12-013] Funding Source: researchfish
  9. MRC [G0600986] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and ubiquitin C-terminal hydrolase-L1 (UCH-L1) have been studied as potential biomarkers of mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). We report the levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 in patients with acute orthopedic injuries without central nervous system involvement, and relate them to the type of extracranial injury, head magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, and levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 in patients with CT-negative mTBI. Serum UCH-L1 and GFAP were longitudinally measured from 73 patients with acute orthopedic injury on arrival and on days 1, 2, 3, 7 after admission, and on the follow-up visit 3-10 months after the injury. The injury types were recorded, and 71% patients underwent also head MRI. The results were compared with those found in patients with CT-negativemTBI (n = 93). The levels of GFAP were higher in patients with acute orthopedic trauma than in patients with CT-negative mTBI (p = 0.026) on arrival; however, no differences were found on the following days. The levels of UCH-L1 were not significantly different between these two groups at any measured point of time. Levels of GFAP and UCH-L1 were not able to distinguish patients with CT-negative mTBI from patients with orthopedic trauma. Patients with orthopedic trauma and high levels of UCH-L1 or GFAP values may be falsely diagnosed as having a concomitant mTBI, predisposing them to unwarranted diagnostics and unnecessary brain imaging. This casts a significant doubt on the diagnostic value of GFAP and UCH-L1 in cases with mTBI.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available