4.5 Article

Developing a Cognition Endpoint for Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Trials

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 363-371

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT, INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2016.4443

Keywords

clinical trials; cognition; craniocerebral trauma; neuropsychological tests; outcome assessment; psychometrics

Funding

  1. Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute Clinician-Scientist Career Development Award
  2. INTRuST Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury Clinical Consortium - Department of Defense Psychological Health/Traumatic Brain Injury Research Program [X81XWH-07-CC-CSDoD]
  3. Harvard Integrated Program to Protect and Improve the Health of NFLPA Members
  4. Mooney-Reed Charitable Foundation
  5. NIH [U01 NS086090-01]
  6. DOD USAMRAA [W81XWH-13-1-0441]
  7. DOD [W81XWH-14-2-0176]
  8. One Mind

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cognitive impairment is a core clinical feature of traumatic brain injury (TBI). After TBI, cognition is a key determinant of post-injury productivity, outcome, and quality of life. As a final common pathway of diverse molecular and microstructural TBI mechanisms, cognition is an ideal endpoint in clinical trials involving many candidate drugs and nonpharmacological interventions. Cognition can be reliably measured with performance-based neuropsychological tests that have greater granularity than crude rating scales, such as the Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended, which remain the standard for clinical trials. Remarkably, however, there is no well-defined, widely accepted, and validated cognition endpoint for TBI clinical trials. A single cognition endpoint that has excellent measurement precision across a wide functional range and is sensitive to the detection of small improvements (and declines) in cognitive functioning would enhance the power and precision of TBI clinical trials and accelerate drug development research. We outline methodologies for deriving a cognition composite score and a research program for validation. Finally, we discuss regulatory issues and the limitations of a cognition endpoint.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available