4.2 Article

Selection third-party logistics service providers in supply chain finance by a hesitant fuzzy linguistic combined compromise solution method

Journal

ECONOMIC RESEARCH-EKONOMSKA ISTRAZIVANJA
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages 4033-4058

Publisher

ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/1331677X.2019.1678502

Keywords

Multiple criteria decision making; third-party logistics service providers; combined compromise solution method; hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set; supply chain finance; CoCoSo

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71771156, 71971145]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In supply chain finance, the multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) problem of selecting a suitable third-party logistics (3PL) service supplier is of great significance to financial institutions. A suitable 3PL service supplier can not only help financial institutions carry out the supply chain finance business, but also can replace financial institutions to supervise the operation of a target financing supply chain, thus reducing the operational risks of financial institutions. As a useful MCDM method, the combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method mainly combines a compromise decision algorithm with an aggregation strategy to obtain a compromise solution. This study extends the CoCoSo method to hesitant fuzzy linguistic environment to solve the multi-expert MCDM problem of the 3PL service supplier selection. Target criteria whose values are in linguistic forms are considered in the process of normalizing the decision matrix. A new integration approach with respect to subordinate compromise scores is introduced, and the subjective and objective weights of criteria are considered simultaneously in this extended process to avoid one-sidedness of criterion weights. A case study about the 3PL service supplier selection is given, in which the sensitivity analysis and comparative analysis are provided to highlight the advantages of the proposed method.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available