4.7 Article

Visual Experience Shapes the Neural Networks Remapping Touch into External Space

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 37, Issue 42, Pages 10097-10103

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1213-17.2017

Keywords

blindness; crossed-hands deficit; spatial frames of reference; tactile localization; temporal order judgment

Categories

Funding

  1. Canada Research Chair Program
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Belgian National Funds for Scientific Research
  4. Wallonie-Bruxelles International WBI-World Excellence Fellowship
  5. European Union Horizon Research and Innovation Programme under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Grant [700057]
  6. MADVIS European Research Council Starting Grant [ERC-StG 337573]
  7. Marie Curie Actions (MSCA) [700057] Funding Source: Marie Curie Actions (MSCA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Localizing touch relies on the activation of skin-based and externally defined spatial frames of reference. Psychophysical studies have demonstrated that early visual deprivation prevents the automatic remapping of touch into external space. We used fMRI to characterize how visual experience impacts the brain circuits dedicated to the spatial processing of touch. Sighted and congenitally blind humans performed a tactile temporal order judgment (TOJ) task, either with the hands uncrossed or crossed over the body midline. Behavioral data confirmed that crossing the hands has a detrimental effect on TOJ judgments in sighted but not in early blind people. Crucially, the crossed hand posture elicited enhanced activity, when compared with the uncrossed posture, in a frontoparietal network in the sighted group only. Psychophysiological interaction analysis revealed, however, that the congenitally blind showed enhanced functional connectivity between parietal and frontal regions in the crossed versus uncrossed hand postures. Our results demonstrate that visual experience scaffolds the neural implementation of the location of touch in space.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available