4.4 Article

Comparison of physicochemical traits of dry-cured ham from purebred Berkshire and crossbred Landrace x Yorkshire x Duroc (LYD) pigs

Journal

JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 1, Pages 35-40

Publisher

KOREAN SOCIETY ANIMAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
DOI: 10.5187/jast.2019.61.1.35

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. IPET agricultural life industry technical development project [318022-04-1-SB010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study was conducted to compare the physicochemical traits of dry-cured hams made from two different pig breeds: Berkshire and Landrace x Yorkshire x Duroc (LYD). Pigs were slaughtered at a live weight of approximately 110 kg and cooled at 0 degrees C for 24 h in a chilling room. Then, the ham portion of the carcasses were cut and processed by dry-curing for physicochemical analyses. The dry-cured hams from Berkshire contain higher crude protein, fat, and ash level than those from LYD, whereas the hams from LYD had higher moisture contents than those from Berkshire(p< 0.05). The pH values of the hams from Berkshire were lower than those from LYD (p < 0.05). The hams from Berkshire had lower L* and b* values than those from LYD (p < 0.05). Palmitoleic acid (C16: 1), oleic acid (C18: 1), elaidic acid (C18: 1t), monounsaturated fatty acids, and ratio of n-6 and n-3 fatty acids (n-6/ n-3) in the ham from Berkshire were higher than LYD (p < 0.05). Free amino acids such as aspartic acid, threonine, serine, asparagine, glutamic acid, and lysine in hams from Berkshire were higher than those from LYD (p < 0.05). The microbial population had no significant difference between Berkshire and LYD dry-cured ham. The cross sections of dry cured ham showed difference from different breeds using scanning electron microscope and indicates some differences in texture. Considering the meat quality parameters of ham, hams from Berkshire could provide variety of ham for consumer who are seeking various different qualities and stories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available