4.3 Article

In vitro activity of linezolid as assessed through the 2013 LEADER surveillance program

Journal

DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE
Volume 81, Issue 4, Pages 283-289

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2014.12.009

Keywords

LEADER; Linezolid; Oxazolidinones

Funding

  1. Pfizer
  2. Pfizer via the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program platform
  3. Achaogen
  4. Actelion
  5. Affinium
  6. American Proficiency Institute
  7. AmpliPhi Bio
  8. Anacor
  9. Astellas
  10. AstraZeneca
  11. Basilea
  12. BioVersys
  13. Cardeas
  14. Cempra
  15. Cerexa
  16. Cubist
  17. Daiichi
  18. Dipexium
  19. Durata
  20. Fedora
  21. Forest Research Institute
  22. Furiex
  23. Genentech
  24. GlaxoSmithKline
  25. Janssen
  26. Johnson Johnson
  27. Medpace
  28. Meiji Seika Kaisha
  29. Melinta
  30. Merck
  31. Methylgene
  32. Nabriva
  33. Nanosphere
  34. Novartis
  35. Polyphor
  36. Rempex
  37. Roche
  38. Seachaid
  39. Shionogi
  40. Synthes
  41. Medicines Co.
  42. Theravance
  43. Thermo Fisher
  44. Venatorx
  45. Vertex
  46. Waterloo

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The 2013 LEADER surveillance program monitored the in vitro activity of linezolid and comparator agents against Gram-positive bacteria at 60 medical centers in the United States. A total of 7183 pathogens were contributed from 6 predetermined pathogen groups. The groups were Staphylococcus aureus, coagulase-negative staphylococci, enterococci, Streptococcus pneumoniae,beta-hemolytic streptococci, and viridans group streptococci. The MIC90 value for each of the 6 pathogen groups was 1 mu g/mL. Susceptibility of all organisms to linezolid was 99.83%. Only 12 isolates (2 S. aureus, 3 Staphylococcus epidermidis, 1 Streptococcus sanguinis, 5 Enterococcus faecium, and 1 Enterococcus faecalis) were nonsusceptible to linezolid (0.17%). Three of these (2 S. aureus and 1 E. faecium) harbored the cfr resistance mechanism. The findings indicate that linezolid activity remains stable, although there are examples of clonal dissemination within several monitored institutions. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available