4.7 Review

Recent progress of nanomaterials for microwave absorption

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIOMICS
Volume 5, Issue 4, Pages 503-541

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmat.2019.07.003

Keywords

Nanomaterials; Microwave absorption; Carbon nanotubes; Metal-organic framework; Permeability

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [DMR-1609061]
  2. School of Biological and Chemical Sciences
  3. College of Arts and Sciences, University of Missouri - Kansas City

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microwave absorbing materials have received considerable interest over the years for their applications in stealth, communications, and information processing technologies. These materials often require functionalization at the nanoscale so to achieve desirable dielectric and magnetic properties which induce interaction with incident electromagnetic radiation. This article presents a comprehensive review on the recent research progress of nanomaterials for microwave absorption, including the basic mechanism of microwave absorption (e.g., dielectric loss, magnetic loss, dielectric/magnetic loss coupling), measurement principle (e.g., fundamentals of analysis, performance evaluation, common interaction pathways: Debye relaxation, Eddy current loss, natural resonance, size and shape factors), and the advances and performance review in microwave absorption (e.g., absorption bandwidth, reflection loss values, absorption peak position) using various nanomaterials, such as carbon nanotubes, carbon fibers, graphenes, oxides, sulfides, phosphides, carbides, polymers and metal organic frameworks. Overall, this article not only provides an introduction on the fundamentals of microwave absorption research, but also presents a timely update on the research progress of the microwave absorption performance of various nanomaterials. (C) 2019 The Chinese Ceramic Society. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available