4.3 Article

Serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D predicts infarct volume and mortality in ischemic stroke patients

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMMUNOLOGY
Volume 313, Issue -, Pages 41-45

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneuroim.2017.10.002

Keywords

25-Hydroxyvitamin D; Ischemic stroke; Mortality; Cardiovascular disease

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The aim of this study is to determine 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH) D] levels in serum, and investigate their associations with cardiovascular disease (CVD) or all-cause mortality in a 1-year follow-up study in patients with first-ever ischemic stroke. Methods: From November 2013 to October 2015, 387 consecutive patients with ischemic stroke admitted to our hospital were identified. Serum 25(OH) D levels were measured at admission. Infarct volume was measured using diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). The primary end point was CVD mortality among 1 year. The secondary end point was all-cause mortality. Results: In this study, 387 patients were included. A statistically significant negative correlation between serum 25(OH) D level and infarct volume was found (r = 0.442; P < 0.001). There were 74 patients (19.1%, 95%CI: 15.2%-23.0%) died, including 36 CVD mortality (9.3%, 95C1%: 6.4%-12.2%). The mortality distribution across the 25(OH) D quartiles ranged between 39.2% (first quartile) to 5.2% (fourth quartile) for all-cause mortality and between 18.6% (first quartile) to 2.1% (fourth quartile) for CVD mortality. In a multivariate model using the first quartiles of 25(OH) D vs. quartiles 2 through 4 together with the clinical variables, the marker displayed prognostic information CVD mortality: OR for first quartile, 3.06 [95% CI, 2.16-4.95]; all-cause mortality: OR for first quartile, 2.76 [95% CI, 2.01-4.32]. Conclusions: The data show serum levels of 25(OH) D at admission is useful prognostic marker of CVD and all cause mortality in Chinese patients with ischemic stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available