4.2 Article

An MRI Hyperintense Acute Reperfusion Marker Is Related to Elevated Peripheral Monocyte Count in Acute Ischemic Stroke

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROIMAGING
Volume 28, Issue 1, Pages 57-60

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jon.12462

Keywords

Stroke; blood-brain barrier; monocytes; MRI

Funding

  1. NIH, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSEBlood-brain barrier (BBB) disruption detected on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in acute ischemic stroke as a hyperintense acute reperfusion marker (HARM) is associated with upregulation of matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9). Although activated leukocytes, including monocytes, are the main source of MMPs, limited data exist to support relationship between leukocyte activation and BBB disruption in patients with acute ischemic stroke. The goal of this study is to investigate the relationship between neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes with BBB disruption detected as HARM (+) in patients with acute ischemic stroke. METHODSWe conducted a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in patients who did not receive any reperfusion therapy with acute (<12 hours) ischemic stroke. MRI scans were obtained at baseline, 24 hours, and 5 days. HARM was evaluated on the 24-hour follow-up scan. RESULTSThirty-three patients were studied. HARM was detected in 27% of patients. Median volumes of baseline perfusion (mean transit time [MTT]) deficit (219.4 mL vs. 158.4 mL, P = .029) and DWI infarct growth at 24 hours (18.50 mL vs. .14 mL, P = .017), as well as the median absolute numbers (1 x 10(3)/mm(3)) of monocytes, were significantly higher in HARM (+) versus HARM (-) patients (0.9 vs. 0.6, p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONIncreased monocyte count associated with HARM supports importance of systemic inflammation in BBB disruption in acute ischemic stroke.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available