4.6 Review

Antimicrobial peptides: new hope in the war against multidrug resistance

Journal

ZOOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 6, Pages 488-505

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.24272/j.issn.2095-8137.2019.062

Keywords

Multidrug resistance; Nosocomial infections; Antimicrobial peptide; Antibiotic alternatives

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21761142002, 31801975]
  2. Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDB31000000, SAJC201606, KFZD-SW-2192, KFJ-BRP-008, KGFZD-135-17-011]
  3. Yunnan Province Grant [2015HA023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The discovery of antibiotics marked a golden age in the revolution of human medicine. However, decades later, bacterial infections remain a global healthcare threat, and a return to the pre-antibiotic era seems inevitable if stringent measures are not adopted to curb the rapid emergence and spread of multidrug resistance and the indiscriminate use of antibiotics. In hospital settings, multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens, including carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE), methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), and extended- spectrum beta-lactamases (ESBL) bearing Acinetobacter baumannii, Escherichia coli, and Kiebsiella pneumoniae are amongst the most problematic due to the paucity of treatment options, increased hospital stay, and exorbitant medical costs. Antimicrobial peptides (AMPs) provide an excellent potential strategy for combating these threats. Compared to empirical antibiotics, they show low tendency to select for resistance, rapid killing action, broad-spectrum activity, and extraordinary clinical efficacy against several MDR strains. Therefore, this review highlights multidrug resistance among nosocomial bacterial pathogens and its implications and reiterates the importance of AMPs as next-generation antibiotics for combating MDR superbugs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available