Journal
PLANNING THEORY
Volume 18, Issue 4, Pages 470-491Publisher
SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/1473095219852988
Keywords
abolition ecology; biopolitical production; Chicago; racial capitalism; the commons
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The literature on biopolitical production largely presumes that contemporary capital is parasitic, enclosing and capturing value that is autonomously and collectively produced across the urban landscape. In contrast, this article suggests that in particular contexts, planners-acting largely as surrogates for urban real estate capital-play an active role in the production of the urban commons for the sake of future enclosure. Using contemporary Chicago as a point of reference, it argues that such commons are (generally) produced in locales of racialized ontological devaluation-in spaces that have been historically marginalized under racial capitalism. Further still, this article develops a theoretical concept, the biopolitical commons, to name those spaces and practices that are produced for the sake of future racialized biopolitical accumulation-pulling together, in the process, research on biopolitical production and abolition ecology. Finally, this article concludes by posing a series of questions for future research on the biopolitical commons.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available