4.5 Article

Opening the ventricle during surgery diminishes survival among patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with carmustine wafers: a multi-center retrospective study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 134, Issue 1, Pages 83-88

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-017-2488-7

Keywords

Glioblastoma; Ventricle; Carmustine wafers

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Carmustine wafers (CW) were approved in Japan for newly diagnosed and recurrent malignant gliomas during 2013. The ventricle is often opened during surgery to achieve maximum resection. While not generally recommended in such situations, CW might be safely achieved by occluding an opened ventricle using gelform or collagen sheets. However, whether CW implantation actually confers a survival benefit for patients who undergo surgery with an open ventricle to treat glioblastoma remains unclear. Clinical, imaging, and survival data were collected in this multicenter retrospective study of 122 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to determine adverse events and efficacy. Overall, 54 adverse events of all grades developed in 35 (28.6%) patients, with the most common being new seizures (16%). Adverse events did not significantly differ between patients with opened and closed ventricles during surgery. The 10- and 21.7-month, median, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS), respectively did not significantly differ according to resection rates. However, median PFS and OS were significantly longer among patients with closed, than open ventricles (12.8 vs. 7.4 months; p = 0.0039 and 26.9 vs. 18.6 months; p = 0.011, respectively). Implanting CW into the resection cavity during concomitant radiochemotherapy with temozolomide seems to yield better survival rates without increased adverse events. Occlusion of the ventricular opening during surgery might be safe for CW implantation, but less so for treating patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available