4.7 Article

A20 as an immune tolerance factor can determine islet transplant outcomes

Journal

JCI INSIGHT
Volume 4, Issue 21, Pages -

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.131028

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Postgraduate Award
  2. International Pancreas and Islet Transplant Association (IPITA)
  3. CIHR [MOP 119500]
  4. NSW Office for Health and Medical Research
  5. NHMRC [596825, 1130222]
  6. ARC
  7. JDRF [4-SRA-2016-265-M-B]
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1130222, 596825] Funding Source: NHMRC

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Islet transplantation can restore lost glycemic control in type 1 diabetes subjects but is restricted in its clinical application by a limiting supply of islets and the need for heavy immune suppression to prevent rejection. TNFAIP3, encoding the ubiquitin editing enzyme A20, regulates the activation of immune cells by raising NF-kappa 8 signaling thresholds. Here, we show that increasing A20 expression in allogeneic islet grafts resulted in permanent survival for similar to 45% of recipients, and > 80% survival when combined with subtherapeutic rapamycin. Allograft survival was dependent upon Tregs and was antigen specific, and grafts showed reduced expression of inflammatory factors. Transplantation of islets with A20 containing a loss-of-function variant (1325N) resulted in increased RIPK1 ubiquitination and NF-kappa 8 signaling, graft hyperinflammation, and acute allograft rejection. Overexpression of A20 in human islets potently reduced expression of inflammatory mediators, with no impact on glucose-stimulated insulin secretion. Therapeutic administration of A20 raises inflammatory signaling thresholds to favor immune tolerance and promotes islet allogeneic survival. Clinically, this would allow for reduced immunosuppression and support the use of alternate islet sources.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available