3.8 Proceedings Paper

Weakly-supervised Deep Learning of Interstitial Lung Disease Types on CT Images

Journal

Publisher

SPIE-INT SOC OPTICAL ENGINEERING
DOI: 10.1117/12.2512746

Keywords

interstitial pneumonia; ILD; weakly-supervised; representation learning; neural network

Funding

  1. MEXT/JSPS KAKENHI [26108006, 26560255, 17H00867, 17K20099]
  2. JSPS Bilateral Collaboration Grant
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26560255, 17K20099, 17H00867] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate classification and precise quantification of interstitial lung disease (ILD) types on CT images remain important challenges in clinical diagnosis. Multi-modality image information is required to assist diagnosing diseases. To build scalable deep-learning solutions for this problem, how to take full advantage of existing large-scale datasets in modern hospitals has become a critical task. In this paper, we present DeepILD, as a novel computer-aided diagnostic framework to address the ILD classification task only from single modality (CT image) using a deep neural network. More specifically, we propose integrating spherical semi-supervised K-means clustering and convolutional neural networks for ILD classification and disease quantification. We firstly use semi-supervised spherical K-means to divide the CT lung area into normal and abnormal sub-regions. A convolutional neural network (CNN) is subsequently invoked to perform training using image patches extracted from the abnormal regions. Here, we focus on the classification of three chronic fibrosing ILD types: idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), idiopathic non-specific interstitial pneumonia (iNSIP), and chronic hypersensitivity pneumonia (CHP). Excellent classification accuracy has been achieved using a dataset of 188 CT scans; in particular, our IPF classification reached about 88% accuracy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available