4.1 Article Proceedings Paper

A decision-support tool for investment analysis of automated oestrus detection technologies in a seasonal dairy production system

Journal

ANIMAL PRODUCTION SCIENCE
Volume 59, Issue 12, Pages 2280-2287

Publisher

CSIRO PUBLISHING
DOI: 10.1071/AN17730

Keywords

precision dairy farming; precision dairy monitoring; seasonal dairying

Funding

  1. New Zealand dairy farmers through DairyNZ Inc.
  2. Ministry for Primary Industries Primary Growth Partnership funding

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Advances in automated oestrus detection have made this an attractive technology to help reduce manual oestrus detection labour on dairy farms. Aims. A decision-support tool was created to help farmers estimate the investment outcome of adopting automated oestrus detection technologies in a seasonal dairy production system. Methods. A decision-support tool was created using Excel 2011 (Microsoft Inc., Redmond, WA, USA). The tool allows farmers to input both current herd reproductive management costs and performance and automated oestrus detection technology system costs and performance to receive herd-specific estimates of investment benefit. The investment analysis outputs include the net present value (NPV), internal rate of return (IRR), and payback period associated with automated oestrus detection adoption. Two different automated oestrus detection technologies were compared with visual oestrus detection aided by tail paint with a 72.0% oestrus detection rate (sensitivity) to demonstrate the value of the investment analysis tool. The alternative scenarios, technology one and technology two, were compared over an eight-year investment period. Key results. Technology one, with a 62.4% oestrus detection rate, resulted in a negative NPV and IRR (-NZ$182 567 and -100% respectively), indicating a poor investment. Technology two, with an oestrus detection rate of 91.0%, provided a positive NPV and IRR (NZ$177 890 and 38.7% respectively), indicating a beneficial investment. The payback period for technology one was estimated as >10 years, whereas technology two's payback period was <1 year. Conclusions. The investment tool results are dependent on farm-specific and automated oestrus detection inputs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available