Journal
ENVIRONMENTAL & RESOURCE ECONOMICS
Volume 74, Issue 4, Pages 1533-1562Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10640-019-00379-y
Keywords
Lottery game; Choice experiment; Flood risk; Bayesian model averaging; Risk attitudes
Categories
Funding
- Swiss National Science Foundation [100018_156709]
- Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [100018_156709] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Decision-making about flood protection is surrounded by outcome uncertainty. In this paper we look at the influence of individual risk attitudes on flood protection decisions. To this end, we combine the results of a lottery game with the findings from a discrete choice experiment focusing on flood risk reduction measures. We find that the inclusion of non-linear probability weighting increases the explanatory power of the choice model. The result is however sensitive to behavioral assumptions about decisions under uncertainty, as well as whether the lottery was played in the loss or gain domain. Including risk attitudes in the probability weighted model decreases marginal willingness to pay for measures with a low to intermediate flood risk reduction capacity and increases marginal willingness to pay for measures with a very high flood risk reduction effect. This has important implications for the social acceptability of flood reduction measures under different baseline conditions.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available