4.6 Article

Effect of sintering temperatures on the in vitro bioactivity, molecular structure and mechanical properties of titanium/carbonated hydroxyapatite nanobiocomposites

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE
Volume 1150, Issue -, Pages 188-195

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.08.070

Keywords

In vitro bioactivity; Mechanical properties; FTIR spectroscopy; Nanobiocomposites

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Titanium-containing carbonated hydroxyapatite (Ti-CHA) nanocomposite powders, with different CHA contents, have been prepared using high-energy ball milling method. The effect of sintering temperatures, 900,1100 and 1300 degrees C on molecular structure and microstructure of these samples were examined by XRD; Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Furthermore, their mechanical properties including hardness, longitudinal modulus, Young's modulus, shear modulus, bulk modulus and Poisson's ratio were measured by ultrasonic non-destructive technique. Moreover, bioactivity of sintered samples at different firing temperatures was assessed by immersing them in simulated body fluid at 37 +/- 0.5 degrees C for 7 days and then, analyzed by FTIR spectroscopy. The results pointed out that increasing sintering temperature up to 1100 degrees C caused significant increases in densities and mechanical properties of these nanocomposite samples. However, further increase of firing temperature to 1300 degrees C was responsible for complete CHA decomposition and the resultant alpha-tricalcium (alpha-TCP) phase greatly affected these properties. On the contrary, better bioactivity was observed for sintered samples at 900 degrees C only. However, increase of sintering temperature of these samples up to 1300 degrees C led to severe decrease in their bioactivity due to the formation of highly soluble alpha-TCP phase. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available