4.4 Article

Crossreactivity of an Antiserum Directed to the Gram-Negative Bacterium Neisseria gonorrhoeae with the SNARE-Complex Protein Snap23 Correlates to Impaired Exocytosis in SH-SY5Y Cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 62, Issue 2, Pages 163-180

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-017-0920-2

Keywords

Neisseria gonorrhoeae; Neisseria meningitidis; Snap23; Exocytosis; GluT4; SH-SY5Y cells

Funding

  1. University Medicine Gottingen (UMG)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Early maternal infections with Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) correlate to an increased lifetime schizophrenia risk for the offspring, which might be due to an immune-mediated mechanism. Here, we investigated the interactions of polyclonal antisera to NG (alpha-NG) with a first trimester prenatal brain multiprotein array, revealing among others the SNARE-complex protein Snap23 as a target antigen for alpha-NG. This interaction was confirmed by Western blot analysis with a recombinant Snap23 protein, whereas the closely related Snap25 failed to interact with alpha-NG. Furthermore, a polyclonal antiserum to the closely related bacterium Neisseria meningitidis (alpha-NM) failed to interact with both proteins. Functionally, in SH-SY5Y cells, alpha-NG pretreatment interfered with both insulin-induced vesicle recycling, as revealed by uptake of the fluorescent endocytosis marker FM1-43, and insulin-dependent membrane translocation of the glucose transporter GluT4. Similar effects could be observed for an antiserum raised directly to Snap23, whereas a serum to Snap25 failed to do so. In conclusion, Snap23 seems to be a possible immune target for anti-gonococcal antibodies, the interactions of which seem at least in vitro to interfere with vesicle-associated exocytosis. Whether these changes contribute to the correlation between maternal gonococcal infections and psychosis in vivo remains still to be clarified.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available