4.7 Review

Dysregulation of haematopoietic stem cell regulatory programs in acute myeloid leukaemia

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages 719-727

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-017-1535-3

Keywords

HSPC; MLL gene; AML; ALL

Funding

  1. Cambridge Cancer Centre PhD fellowship [A19405]
  2. MRC [MR/M008975/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  3. Cancer Research UK [21762] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. Medical Research Council [MC_PC_12009, MR/M008975/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Haematopoietic stem cells (HSC) are situated at the apex of the haematopoietic differentiation hierarchy, ensuring the life-long supply of mature haematopoietic cells and forming a reservoir to replenish the haematopoietic system in case of emergency such as acute blood loss. To maintain a balanced production of all mature lineages and at the same time secure a stem cell reservoir, intricate regulatory programs have evolved to control multi-lineage differentiation and self-renewal in haematopoietic stem and progenitor cells (HSPCs). Leukaemogenic mutations commonly disrupt these regulatory programs causing a block in differentiation with simultaneous enhancement of proliferation. Here, we briefly summarize key aspects of HSPC regulatory programs, and then focus on their disruption by leukaemogenic fusion genes containing the mixed lineage leukaemia (MLL) gene. Using MLL as an example, we explore important questions of wider significance that are still under debate, including the importance of cell of origin, to what extent leukaemia oncogenes impose specific regulatory programs and the relevance of leukaemia stem cells for disease development and prognosis. Finally, we suggest that disruption of stem cell regulatory programs is likely to play an important role in many other pathologies including ageing-associated regenerative failure.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available