4.7 Review

The remedy within: will the microbiome fulfill its therapeutic promise?

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR MEDICINE-JMM
Volume 95, Issue 10, Pages 1021-1027

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00109-017-1563-z

Keywords

Microbiome; Therapy; Metabolites; Fecal microbiome transplantation; Postbiotics

Funding

  1. Boehringer Ingelheim Fonds PhD Fellowship
  2. Yael and Rami Ungar, Israel
  3. Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust
  4. Gurwin Family Fund for Scientific Research
  5. Crown Endowment Fund for Immunological Research
  6. estate of Jack Gitlitz
  7. estate of Lydia Hershkovich
  8. Benoziyo Endowment Fund for the Advancement of Science
  9. Adelis Foundation
  10. John L. and Vera Schwartz, Pacific Palisades
  11. Alan Markovitz, Canada
  12. Cynthia Adelson, Canada
  13. CNRS (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique)
  14. estate of Samuel and Alwyn J. Weber
  15. Mr. and Mrs. Donald L. Schwarz and Sherman Oaks
  16. European Research Council
  17. German-Israel Binational foundation
  18. Israel Science Foundation
  19. Minerva Foundation
  20. Rising Tide foundation
  21. Alon Foundation scholar award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The last decade of research has witnessed a tremendous upsurge in our understanding of the intestinal microbiome and its role in a large range of human diseases, which has incited hopes for a rapid clinical utilization of the new insights for the development of microbiome-based therapies. Nonetheless, only a single microbiome-targeted therapy has so far found its way into clinical routine: fecal microbiota transplantation for patients suffering from recurrent Clostridium difficile infections. Herein, we discuss the currenthopes, advances, challenges, and obstacles for translating basic microbiome research into therapeutic applications for a larger number of diseases and provide an outline of how such clinical applications might emerge.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available