4.3 Review

Evidence-based strategy for dental biofilms: Current evidence of mouthwashes on dental biofilm and gingivitis

Journal

JAPANESE DENTAL SCIENCE REVIEW
Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 33-40

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jdsr.2018.07.001

Keywords

Dental biofilm; Mouthwash; Chemical control; Gingivitis; Dental caries

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science [15H05021, 16K15785, 16K20451, 26305034, 26462876]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [26462876, 15H05021, 16K15785, 26305034, 16K20451] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Therapeutic mouthwash (MW) is an adjunctive tool along with a regular oral hygiene routine of daily tooth brushing and daily flossing. Previous systematic reviews have demonstrated that it is effective against dental biofilm and gingival inflammation, for prevention of dental caries, and for managing one's bad breath condition according to the active ingredients. MWs prevent the microorganisms from bacterial adhesion that corresponds to the initial step in biofilm formation. This review summarized the current state of evidence such as anti-biofilm, anti-gingivitis and cariostatic properties of MWs by evaluating systematic reviews from the past six years. The anti-biofilm property has been proven to be effective, with strong evidence of three main clinical efficacies. The most commonly studied active agent was chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX), followed by essential oil (EO) and cetylpyridinium chloride. All the systematic reviews are in complete agreement that CHX and EO provide statistically significant improvements in terms of plaque and gingival indices. These effects have held up over the years as the number of studies has increased. While the use of fluoride MW is proven to be effective in improving the oral health of both children and adults, the quality of evidence is still regarded as low. (C) 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd on behalf of The Japanese Association for Dental Science.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available