4.4 Article

Development and Clinical Utility of a Blood-Based Test Service for the Rapid Identification of Actionable Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR DIAGNOSTICS
Volume 19, Issue 3, Pages 404-416

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2016.11.004

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Biodesix, Inc.

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nearly 80% of cancer patients do not have genetic mutation results available at initial oncology consultation; up to 25% of patients begin treatment before receiving their results. These factors hinder the ability to pursue optimal treatment strategies. This study validates a blood-based genome-testing service that provides accurate results within 72 hours. We focused on targetable variants in advanced non small cell Lung carcinoma-epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) variant L858R, exon 19 deletion (AE746-A750), and T790M; GTPase Kirsten ras gene (KRAS) variants G12C/D/V; and echinoderm microtubule associated protein like and 4 anaplastic lymphoma receptor tyrosine kinase fusion (EML4-ALK) transcripts 1/2/3. Test development included method and clinical validation using samples from donors with (n = 219) or without (n = 30) cancer. Clinical sensitivity and specificity for each variant ranged from 78.6% to 100% and 94.2% to 100%, respectively. We also report on 1643 non small cell lung carcinoma samples processed in our CLIA-certified laboratory. Mutation results were available within 72 hours for 94% of the tests evaluated. We detected 10.5% mutations for EGFR sensitizing (n = 2801 samples tested), 13.8% mutations for EGFR resistance (n = 1055), 13.2% mutations in KRAS (n = 3477), and 2% mutations for EML4-ALKfusion (n = 304). This rapid, highly sensitive, and actionable blood-based assay service expands testing options and supports faster treatment decisions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available