4.7 Article

Insights into the Distinct Mechanisms of Action of Taxane and Non-Taxane Microtubule Stabilizers from Cryo-EM Structures

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Volume 429, Issue 5, Pages 633-646

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2017.01.001

Keywords

cryo-EM; microtubule; microtubule-stabilizing agents; Taxol; peloruside; zampanolide

Funding

  1. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  2. NIH [GM51487]
  3. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [BIO2013-42984-R]
  4. Comunidad Autonoma de Madrid [S2010/BMD-2457 BIPEDD2]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of microtubule (MT)-stabilizing lagents (MSAs) have demonstrated or predicted potential as anticancer agents, but a detailed. structural basis for their mechanism of action is still lacking. We have obtained high-resolution (3.9-4.2 angstrom) cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM) reconstructions of MTs stabilized by the taxane-site binders Taxol and zampanolide, and by peloruside, which targets a distinct, non-taxoid pocket on 13-tubulin. We find that each molecule has unique distinct structural effects on the MT lattice structure. Peloruside acts primarily at lateral contacts and has an effect on the seam of heterologous interactions, enforcing a conformation more similar to that of homologous (i.e., non-seam) contacts by which it regularizes the MT lattice. In contrast, binding of either Taxol or zampanolide induces MT heterogeneity. In doubly bound MTs, peloruside overrides the heterogeneity induced by Taxol binding. Our structural analysis illustrates distinct mechanisms of these drugs for stabilizing the MT lattice and is of relevance to the possible use of combinations of MSAs to regulate MT activity and improve therapeutic potential. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available