4.6 Article

Leveraging open-standard interorganizational information systems for process adaptability and alignment An empirical analysis

Journal

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJOPM-12-2018-0747

Keywords

Supply chain integration; Industry 4; 0; Open standards; Process adaptability; Inter-organizational information systems

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [NSFC: 71801204]
  2. Major Collaboration Grant [2017D10032]
  3. Ningbo Science and Technology Bureau

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the value creation mechanisms of open-standard inter-organizational information system (OSIOS), which is a key technology to achieve Industry 4.0. Specifically, this study investigates how the internal assimilation and external diffusion of OSIOS help manufactures facilitate process adaptability and alignment in supply chain network. Design/methodology/approach A survey instrument was designed and administrated to collect data for this research. Using three-stage least squares estimation, the authors empirically tested a number of hypothesized relationships based on a sample of 308 manufacturing firms in China. Findings The results of the study show that OSIOS can perform as value creation mechanisms to enable process adaptability and alignment. In addition, the impact of OSIOS internal assimilation is inversely U-shaped where the positive effect on process adaptability will become negative after an extremum point is reached. Originality/value This study contributes to the existing literature by providing insights on how OSIOS can improve supply chain integration and thus promote the achievement of industry 4.0. By revealing a U-shaped relationship between OSIOS assimilation and process adaptability, this study fills previous research gap by advancing the understanding on the value creation mechanisms of information systems deployment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available