4.3 Article

Serotype determination of Salmonella by xTAG assay

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROBIOLOGICAL METHODS
Volume 141, Issue -, Pages 101-107

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.mimet.2017.08.011

Keywords

Salmonella; Serotyping; xTAG; Luminex

Funding

  1. Hangzhou Science and Technology Bureau [20140633B24]
  2. Health microbiology key discipline of Health and Family Planning Commission of Hangzhou Municipality, China

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, no protocols or commercial kits are available to determine the serotypes of Salmonella by using Luminex MAGPIX (R). In this study, an xTAG assay for serotype determination of Salmonella suitable for Luminex MAGPIX (R) is described and 228 Salmonella isolates were serotype determined by this xTAG assay. The xTAG assay consists of two steps: 1) Multiplex PCR to amplify simultaneously 0, H and Vi antigen genes of Salmonella, and 2) Magplex-TAG (TM) microsphere hybridization to identify accurately the specific PCR products of different antigens. Compared with the serotyping results of traditional serum agglutination test, the sensitivity and specificity of the xTAG assay were 95.1% and 100%, respectively. The agreement rate of these two assays was 95.2%. Compared with Luminex xMAP (R) Salmonella Serotyping Assay (SSA) kit, the advantages of this xTAG assay are: First, the magnetic beads make it applicable to both the Luminex (R) 100/200 (TM) and MAGPIX (R) systems. Second, only primers rather than both primers and probes are needed in the xTAG assay, and the process of coupling antigen-specific oligonucleotide probes to beads is circumvented, which make the xTAG assay convenient to be utilized by other laboratories. The xTAG assay may serve as a rapid alternative or complementary method for traditional Salmonella serotyping tests, especially for laboratories that utilize the MAGPIX (R) systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available