4.7 Article

Atmospheric pressure atomic layer deposition for tight ceramic nanofiltration membranes: Synthesis and application in water purification

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 528, Issue -, Pages 163-170

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.01.023

Keywords

Ceramic membrane filtration; Nanofiltration; Atmospheric pressure atomic layer deposition; Water treatment

Funding

  1. Dutch Technology Foundation STW [13346]
  2. Evides Waterbedrijf N.V.
  3. Logisticon B.V.
  4. Kavli Nanolab of Delft

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tight ceramic nanofiltration (NF) membranes allow efficient separation of organic matter and ions for advanced water treatment. These membranes are typically produced by the sol-gel method. Recently, atomic layer deposition (ALD), a self-limiting gas phase coating technique, has been explored for membrane fabrication and modification. In this work, the synthesis of tight ceramic NF membranes is demonstrated using atmospheric pressure ALD (APALD), which is operated without a vacuum-generation system compared to the commonly reported vacuum-based ALD method. Titanium dioxide was coated on nano-porous membrane substrates using merely one to three cycles of APALD. The average size of active pores was effectively narrowed by 0.2 nm, from 0.7 to 0.5 nm. In addition, the size distribution of the active pores became more uniform after the APALD modification. The fabricated tight ceramic NF membranes had a molecular weight cut-off (MWCO) ranging from 260 to 380 Da while maintaining high water permeability at 11-16 L M-2 h(-1) bar', which is notably higher than the commercial tight polymeric NF and sol-gel-made tight ceramic NF membranes. It was observed that conformal TiO2 thin films can be deposited on planar surfaces under the APALD with a growth rate of 0.39 nm per cycle, while the deposition in the membrane micropores was at a lower rate, estimated as 0.05 nm per cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available