4.7 Article

Fouling modelling on a reverse osmosis membrane in the purification of pretreated olive mill wastewater by adapted crossflow blocking mechanisms

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 544, Issue -, Pages 108-118

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.09.018

Keywords

Olive mill wastewater; Modelling; Fouling; Reverse osmosis; Crossflow; Wastewater reclamation

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTM2014-61105-JIN]
  2. University of Granada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, the effect of the operation parameters (crossflow, pressure and temperature) on the individual fouling mechanisms of a RO membrane used for the purification of tertiary-treated OMW is addressed. The knowledge beforehand of the possible fouling mechanisms and the adoption of adequate operating conditions accordingly is key for the control of fouling and the steady performance of the membrane plant. The build-up of a gel layer was found to be dominant from the middle to the final moments of the membrane filtration. However, in the initial filtration periods a different mechanism, the blocking of the surface defects of the membrane, and the contribution of concentration polarization (38.6%) on the boundary region of the membrane, occurred as well before the definite build-up of the cake or gel layer. By applying medium pressure (25-15 bar), the intermediate blocking mechanism was reduced, and the formation of a cake or gel layer over the membrane skin predominated, a less strong form of fouling, whereas the increment of the crossflow (2.5-5.0 m s(-1)) reduced the gel layer formation (K-gl) by 77.1%. Upon the adopted conditions, the stable operation of the membrane regarding the rejection efficiency (CODrejection 97.5-99.1%) and flux (similar to 24-32 L h(-1) m(-2)) allowed to obtain a final purified effluent compatible for irrigation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available