4.7 Article

Polyamide thin film composite nanofiltration membrane modified with acyl chlorided graphene oxide

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 535, Issue -, Pages 208-220

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2017.04.043

Keywords

Nanofiltration; Graphene oxide; Interfacial polymerization; Laminar structure

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51373119]
  2. Science and Technology Plans of Tianjin [16YFZCSF00330, 15PTSYJC00250]
  3. National Key Basic Research Development Program (973 Program) [2014CB660813]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to reach both high water permeability and high ion rejection, a thin-film composite nanofiltration membrane (PA/GO-COCl) with acyl chlorided graphene oxide (GO-COCl) embedded in polyamide (PA) layer was fabricated by interfacial polymerization of piperazine and trimesoyl chloride. GO-COCl was synthesized by acyl chloride reaction with graphene oxide and then added into a nonpolar organic (hexane) phase using 2% ethanol as dispersant. The surface morphologies and chemical structures of the modified membranes were observed by scanning electronic microscopy, atomic force microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy and FTIR spectroscopy. Water flux of the PA/GO-COCl membrane increased from 11.6 to 22.6 L m(-2) h(-1), and salt rejection of Na2SO4 increased from 95.0% to 97.1%, compared with those of the pristine PA membrane. Enhanced performances of the PA/GO-COCl membrane were attributed to the incorporation of laminated graphene oxide sheets, which decrease effective thickness of the active layer and keep the layer intact for high rejection rate. This graphene oxide embedded membrane overcomes the trade-off effect of conventional thin film composite nanofiltration membranes, suggesting a novel method for fabricating 2D laminar materials embedded thin film composite membranes for nanofiltration or reverse osmosis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available